It’s a fair question: Why pursue Agile if most of your team prefers traditional, directive management?

Understanding Different Work Styles:
Traditional Management (Theory X): People prefer clear instructions, close supervision, and a structured environment.
Modern Management (Theory Y): People are self-motivated, enjoy their work, and thrive with more freedom and responsibility.

If an organization has a majority of people who prefer traditional management, adopting Agile can feel like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Agile thrives on autonomy, trust, and self-organization, but if people aren’t ready or willing to embrace that responsibility, the journey can feel like a constant uphill struggle.
The decision to go Agile should always tie back to what the organization aims to achieve. If the goal is to boost flexibility, speed, and customer focus, Agile often makes sense. But if most of the team feels more comfortable with structure and predictability, a hybrid approach might be more practical.

A Crucial Caveat:
While it’s important to align Agile ways of working with the enterprise structure, it’s equally vital to recognize that Agile is designed for solving complex, adaptive problems—like building new products. Traditional models excel in handling complicated and simpler problems. Therefore, introducing Agile is not just about changing management styles but about embedding ways of working that align with the types of problems being solved.
It’s also worth asking: Does the organization want to help its people grow into a more modern, self-motivated mindset, or is it trying to push Agile into a culture that just isn’t ready for it? Culture and readiness are essential—without them, Agile risks becoming just another set of practices that people follow without any real transformation.

So, what’s more important: adapting the way of working to suit the people, or helping the people adjust to a new way of working?v